Resources

Findlaw News

News

Personal Injury

[05/09] 77 more hepatitis cases may trace to clinic, officials say
[05/09] Tornado knocks vehicles around in N. Carolina, kills 1
[05/09] Plame seeks to resurrect lawsuit in CIA leak case
[05/08] Minn. gov signs bill to pay bridge collapse victims
[05/08] Possible tornadoes leave damage in parts of Oklahoma
[05/07] Truck, school bus crash in Ohio, about 4 children injured
[05/06] Illinois paper boy helps save elderly customer who fell
[05/06] $38M bridge victim fund clears Minnesota Legislature
[05/06] Ark. governor urges schools to install tornado-safe rooms
[05/06] Iraqi alleges Abu Ghraib torture, sues US contractors
[05/06] EPA might not act to limit rocket fuel in drinking water
[05/06] VA head says no-cover up on suicide data
[05/05] Police: Motorcyclist flipped bird, popped wheelie, crashed
[05/05] Caution urged in choosing gene tests
[05/05] Who should MDs let die in a pandemic? Report offers answers
[05/05] Who should MDs let die in a pandemic? Report offers answers
[05/05] Iraqi alleges Abu Ghraib torture, sues US contractors
[05/05] Florida court to hear arguments in anthrax death lawsuit
[05/02] After scandal, students are leaving Oral Roberts University
[05/02] Medical marijuana user who was denied liver transplant dies

More...

Case Summaries

Injury & Tort Law

[05/07] Family Home & Fin. Ctr, Inc. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
In mortgage broker's action raising claims against Freddie Mac for intentional interference with contract, unfair competition under California state law, and defamation, summary judgment and a related ruling for Freddie Mac are affirmed where: 1) the intentional interference claim failed as there was no admissible evidence that Freddie Mac influenced or caused another party to terminate its mortgage broker contract with plaintiff, intentionally or otherwise; 2) Freddie Mac's placement of plaintiff on its "Exclusionary List" did not constitute unfair competition; 3) for purposes of the defamation claim, plaintiff failed to show malice to defeat the Common Interest Privilege; and 4) there was no abuse of discretion in denying a request to defer ruling on summary judgment.

[05/07] Serrano v. Stefan Merli Plastering Co., Inc.
Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.510, subdivision (c), and the court's inherent authority to control its ministerial officers and other persons connected with a judicial proceeding in furtherance of justice, authorize the court to require a deposition reporter to provide a copy of a deposition transcript to a non-noticing party in a pending action for a reasonable fee which, in the absence of an agreement between the interested parties, may be set by the court upon a proper evidentiary showing.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.


OFFICE: 361 East Coronado Road - Suite 101 :: Phoenix, Arizona (AZ) :: 85004-1525 :: 602.271.9344 :: EMAIL US

Border Bottom